On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 00:19 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Don't be silly, did any of the developers say, that he has spare time to
> > read your regression lists ?
>
> It worked because several people (including Linus) emphasized that
> fixing regressions from this list was important.
Right. Simply because these lists are assembled by someone
- who knows how to pick that reports from the mailinglists
- who knows how to sort them in a useful way
- who knows how to add the relevant folks on CC
- ....
Can you see the pattern ?
> And it failed because many regressions still stayed unfixed and some
> even undebugged.
No it failed not. It is not perfect. Way more bugs, which have been
fixed or are in the debugging process, would have been unnoticed and
ignored otherwise.
> > So what are you complaining about ? Folks stepped up and built a
> > regression list and posted it to LKML. What's wrong with that ?
>
> If it works it's perfectly fine.
It will work not much different from your lists. It'll be not perfect
either.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
