Andi Kleen wrote:
> I dropped the patch completely because you said it was already in mainline
> or queued elsewhere. Was that wrong?
>
I think both patches are actually needed. The -mm message Antonio
quoted probably refers to the fact that the patch is in your tree, so
Andrew isn't carrying it separately.
The patch called "ignore-vgacon-if-hardware-not-present" on
firstfloor.org is what the name suggests. It appears to be still
needed, because it still applies.
The patch you've posted here with the subject "i386: ignore vgacon if
hardware not present" is actually i386-eflags-header, but it appears to
have a bad first line, which is why it is posted with the wrong subject.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
