On Sunday 29 April 2007, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
[...]
>> > > CFS modifies the scheduler and nothing else, SD fiddles all over the
>> > > kernel in interesting ways.
Huh? Doesn't grok.
>> > Hmmm I guess you confused both of them this time. CFS touches many
>> > places, which is why I think the testing coverage is still very low. SD
>> > can be tested faster. My real concern is : are there still people
>> > observing regressions with it ? If yes, they should be fixed before even
>> > being merged. If no, why not merge it as a fix for the many known corner
>> > cases of current scheduler ? After all, it's already in -mm.
>> >
>> > Willy
>>
>> Willy, you're making far too much sense. Are you replying to the correct
>> mailing list?
>
>FWIW, I strongly agree with Willy.
If we're putting it to a vote, I'm with Willy. But this is a dictatorship and
we shouldn't forget it. :)
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
An ambassador is an honest man sent abroad to lie and intrigue for the
benefit of his country.
-- Sir Henry Wotton, 1568-1639
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
