Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6

On Sunday 29 April 2007 20:30, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> As a sidenote: I really wonder if anybody noticed yet, that the whole
> CFS / SD comparison is so ridiculous, that it is not even funny anymore.
> CFS modifies the scheduler and nothing else, SD fiddles all over the
> kernel in interesting ways.

This is a WTF if ever I saw one.

-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] [25/48] x86_64: Introduce load_TLS to the "for" loop.
Next by Date: [PATCH] [47/48] x86_64: Fix "Section mismatch" compile warning
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]