Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:43:28 +0100 Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:56:34 -0700
> Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:17:40 +1000 David Chinner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Fix up your lameo HBA for reads.
> > > 
> > > Where did that come from? You spend 20 lines described the inefficiencies
> > > of the readahead in the page cache and it should be fixed but then you
> > > turn around and say fix the HBA? 
> > 
> > My (repeated) point is that if we populate pagecache with physically-contiguous 4k
> > pages in this manner then bio+block will be able to create much larger SG lists.
> 
> Also remember that even if you do larger pages by using virtual pairs or
> quads of real pages because it helps on some systems you end up needing
> the same sized sglist as before so you don't make anything worse for
> half-assed controllers as you get the same I/O size providing they have
> the minimal 2 or 4 sg list entries (and those that don't are genuinely
> beyond saving and nowdays very rare)
> 

Could you expand on that a bit please?  I don't get it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux