Re: Fw: [PATCH] ia64: race flushing icache in do_no_page path

[Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>]

Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > OIC, you need a virtual address to evict the icache, so you can't
> > flush at flush_dcache time? Or does ia64 have an instruction to
> > flush the whole icache? (it would be worth testing, to see how much
> > performance suffers).
>
>
> I'm puzzled by that remark: the ia64 flush_icache_range always has
> a virtual address, it uses the kernel virtual address; it takes no
> interest in whether there's a user virtual address.

I _think_ what it is doing is actually flushing dcache lines dirtied
via the kernel virtual address (yes, I think flush_icache in
lazy_mmu_prot_update is actually just flushing the dcache, but I could
be wrong? [*]). There are supposedly no icache lines at that point[**]:
the bug fix at the start of this thread is due to icache lines
becoming present before the flush.

[*] and if I'm right, that means that icache fills don't see dirty
dcache, but rather always load from memory? I hope someone can
answer these questions?

[**] except due to _existing_ executable mappings, of course, but they
seem to have been comprehensively disregarded...

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/