Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:21:24PM +0800, Bryan WU wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 08:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> > > 
> > > You know for some customer's product, they want to use the stable and
> > > long term support kernel instead to use the latest one. 
> > 
> > Then they should get that support from a vendor, not from the kernel.org
> > releases :)
> > 
> 
> Yeah, but we are the vendor as you mentioned. -:))

Ah, then you already know what to do :)

> If we wanna to release a kernel to customer product development, how to
> choose the stable version?

That's up to you.

> Currently, we always followed the kernel release cycle/rules and give
> customer the latest stable version.

Ok, then what has really changed here?  We've been doing this .y release
thing (also called -stable) for about 2 years now, nothing is different
this week from last.

Confused,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux