On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, David Chinner wrote: > > 1-disk and 2-disk read throughput fell by an improbable amount, which makes > > me cautious about the other numbers. > > For read, yes, and it's because something is going wrong with the > I/O size - it looks like readahead thrashing of some kind even > with 4k pages tests. Yup. I seem to have a problem in that area with my patches. Somehow the nr of page is shifted by page order. I do not completely understand what is going on there yet. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Prev by Date: Re: checkpatch, a patch checking script.
- Next by Date: [git pull] DRM patches for 2.6.22-rc1
- Previous by thread: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Next by thread: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Index(es):