On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:27:45PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > I guess 10% isn't a small amount. Though it would be nice to have > before/after numbers for Linux. And, like Andrew was saying, we could > just _attempt_ to put contiguous pages in pagecache rather than > _require_ it. Which is still robust under fragmentation, and benefits > everyone, not just files with a large pagecache size. What sort of strategy do you intend to use to speculatively populate the pagecache with contiguous pages? -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- References:
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Prev by Date: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Next by Date: commit 45cd8d8e -- why?
- Previous by thread: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Next by thread: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Index(es):