On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On (26/04/07 16:40), Siddha, Suresh B didst pronounce:
oops. Appended patch should fix this. Can you please check this and Ack it?
This patch does not apply cleanly to 2.6.21-rc7-mm2.
Mel, Please backout the existing x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime.patch
in rc7-mm2 and apply the appended patch instead.
I backed out
broken-out/x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime.patch
broken-out/x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime-fix.patch
broken-out/x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime-fix-2.patch
and dropped in your new patch. It passed boot tests on the machine in
question, so just from a testing perspective
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Andrew, as you already backedout x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime.patch
from your -mm series, please include the appended patch (as try 2), after
Mel confirms that it works fine on his setup.
Thanks!
Thank you.
---
From: Suresh Siddha <[email protected]>
[patch] x86_64: set node_possible_map at runtime - try 2
Set the node_possible_map at runtime on x86_64. On a non NUMA system,
num_possible_nodes() will now say '1'.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
---
diff -pNru linux/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c
--- linux/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c 2007-04-27 10:37:19.000000000 -0700
+++ linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c 2007-04-27 10:34:10.000000000 -0700
@@ -49,11 +49,8 @@ int __init k8_scan_nodes(unsigned long s
int found = 0;
u32 reg;
unsigned numnodes;
- nodemask_t nodes_parsed;
unsigned dualcore = 0;
- nodes_clear(nodes_parsed);
-
if (!early_pci_allowed())
return -1;
@@ -102,7 +99,7 @@ int __init k8_scan_nodes(unsigned long s
nodeid, (base>>8)&3, (limit>>8) & 3);
return -1;
}
- if (node_isset(nodeid, nodes_parsed)) {
+ if (node_isset(nodeid, node_possible_map)) {
printk(KERN_INFO "Node %d already present. Skipping\n",
nodeid);
continue;
@@ -155,7 +152,7 @@ int __init k8_scan_nodes(unsigned long s
prevbase = base;
- node_set(nodeid, nodes_parsed);
+ node_set(nodeid, node_possible_map);
}
if (!found)
diff -pNru linux/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
--- linux/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c 2007-04-27 10:37:19.000000000 -0700
+++ linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c 2007-04-27 10:34:10.000000000 -0700
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int __init setup_node_range(int n
ret = -1;
}
nodes[nid].end = *addr;
- node_set_online(nid);
+ node_set(nid, node_possible_map);
printk(KERN_INFO "Faking node %d at %016Lx-%016Lx (%LuMB)\n", nid,
nodes[nid].start, nodes[nid].end,
(nodes[nid].end - nodes[nid].start) >> 20);
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ out:
* SRAT.
*/
remove_all_active_ranges();
- for_each_online_node(i) {
+ for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map) {
e820_register_active_regions(i, nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
@@ -497,20 +497,25 @@ void __init numa_initmem_init(unsigned l
{
int i;
+ nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(start_pfn, end_pfn))
return;
+ nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
if (!numa_off && !acpi_scan_nodes(start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))
return;
+ nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_K8_NUMA
if (!numa_off && !k8_scan_nodes(start_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT, end_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT))
return;
+ nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
#endif
printk(KERN_INFO "%s\n",
numa_off ? "NUMA turned off" : "No NUMA configuration found");
@@ -524,6 +529,7 @@ void __init numa_initmem_init(unsigned l
memnodemap[0] = 0;
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
node_set_online(0);
+ node_set(0, node_possible_map);
for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
numa_set_node(i, 0);
node_to_cpumask[0] = cpumask_of_cpu(0);
diff -pNru linux/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
--- linux/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c 2007-04-27 10:37:19.000000000 -0700
+++ linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c 2007-04-27 10:34:10.000000000 -0700
@@ -419,19 +419,21 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long
return -1;
}
+ node_possible_map = nodes_parsed;
+
/* Finally register nodes */
- for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed)
+ for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
/* Try again in case setup_node_bootmem missed one due
to missing bootmem */
- for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed)
+ for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
if (!node_online(i))
setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
if (cpu_to_node[i] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
continue;
- if (!node_isset(cpu_to_node[i], nodes_parsed))
+ if (!node_isset(cpu_to_node[i], node_possible_map))
numa_set_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE);
}
numa_init_array();
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
