Herbert Xu wrote:
> Sure thing. I'll look over it soon.
>
> Actually there is one thing I'd like to see changed first up: I noticed
> that you've stripped out the checksum hack which is in the main Xen tree.
> We actually have the code in net-2.6.22 (which is also in mm) that lets
> you use CHECKSUM_PARTIAL on received packets without having to do that
> hack.
>
> Here's the patch that I've been testing so far. It's against the Xen
> source, but should be easy to adapt to your version as well.
>
> I just thought about this again, and in fact we need this change for
> correctness as well as performance. Because not setting ip_summed
> to CHECKSUM_PARTIAL in netfront is not going to stop netback from
> sending CHECKSUM_PARTIAL packets to us. If these packets are then
> routed/bridged back to netback, they'll have the wrong checksum.
>
OK, I've been sitting on this in the hope that I'll suddenly see the
light and work out what you're talking about - but apparently that's not
going to happen. So, some questions:
1. Does this patch change the dom0 <-> domU interface? or does it
fix something that's currently broken?
2. Can just apply the netfront part to the pv_ops kernel, or does it
require the corresponding dom0 patch to be applied as well?
Thanks,
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
