Re: Linux 2.6.21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adrian Bunk wrote:

Life has taught me that sometimes I'm right, sometimes I'm wrong, and sometimes both sides have a possible solution. We might agree to disagree, and you are the one who's opinion counts. I can only say that I am not happy with the result, and that I do therefore not spend my time on maintaining regression lists for 2.6.22 - and maintaining such lists is not something special noone else could do equally well.

And the next kernel will go out with no list to warn users, and no to-do list for -stable.

--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux