Re: [PATCH] x86_64: dynamic MCE poll interval

> -		printk(KERN_INFO "Machine check events logged\n");
> +		if ((now - last_print) >= check_interval*HZ) {

Shouldn't this use time_after() to handle wrapping? 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86_64: dynamic MCE poll interval
    • From: "Tim Hockin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86_64: dynamic MCE poll interval
    • From: "Tim Hockin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ext3][kernels >= 2.6.20.7 at least] KDE going comatose when FS is under heavy write load (massive starvation)
• Next by Date: Re: [ext3][kernels >= 2.6.20.7 at least] KDE going comatose when FS is under heavy write load (massive starvation)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: dynamic MCE poll interval
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: dynamic MCE poll interval
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]