On Friday 27 April 2007 17:50:06 Mel Gorman wrote:
> On (27/04/07 09:59), Mel Gorman didst pronounce:
> > On (27/04/07 02:39), Andi Kleen didst pronounce:
> > >
> > >
> > > > That's vdso.lds.S, not vdso.lds. The VDSO_TEXT_OFFSET is still 0x400.
> > > > This is what I should have posted the last time
> > > >
> > > > --- build/arch/x86_64/vdso/voffset.h.orig 2007-04-26 08:43:31.523739878 -0700
> > > > +++ build/arch/x86_64/vdso/voffset.h 2007-04-26 08:43:38.839579356 -0700
> > > > @@ -1 +1 @@
> > > > -#define VDSO_TEXT_OFFSET 0x500
> > > > +#define VDSO_TEXT_OFFSET 0x400
> > >
> > > It's definitely 0x400 here. Is your patch reversed and you want 0x500?
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, that patch is reversed. It's 0x500 it needs to be to work here.
> >
>
> What I should have done in the first place..... Sorry for the noise.
I had already fixed it up.
But now can you test Suresh's latest patch too please?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]