Re: [PATCH 01/14] sysfs: fix i_ino handling in sysfs

Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:29:46AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>  what about 32-bit stats from 32-bit apps on 64-bit systems?  This will make 
>>  64-bit inode numbers commonplace in sysfs; will this cause problems?  it 
>>  seems that if they get truncated to 32 bits the possibility of duplicate 
>>  inode nrs will come back...
> 
> Yes, this turned out to be a problem as the ppc people found out :)
> 
> Tejun had some follow-on patches fixing this issue up.

Oops, missed that.  I'll go looking, thanks.

-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 01/14] sysfs: fix i_ino handling in sysfs
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/14] sysfs: fix i_ino handling in sysfs
    • From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/14] sysfs: fix i_ino handling in sysfs
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 18/38] Improved oops output.
• Next by Date: Re: [linux-pm] driver power operations (was Re: suspend2 merge)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/14] sysfs: fix i_ino handling in sysfs
• Next by thread: [PATCH 02/14] sysfs: fix error handling in binattr write()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]