Re: [linux-pm] driver power operations (was Re: suspend2 merge)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 16:39 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:

> Good point. Though if we go for passing the interrupt-enable setting as
> an argument then many drivers will have the same
> "if (irqs_disabled()) return" code. Hm. I guess passing it isn't even
> strictly necessary.

Eh, the point I actually wanted to make is that many drivers don't care
for the irqs disabled case and would have to add code to exclude it.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux