On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 15:59 +0400, Marat Buharov wrote:
> On 4/27/07, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Aside: why the heck do applications think that their data is so important
> > that they need to fsync it all the time. I used to run a kernel on my
> > laptop which had "return 0;" at the top of fsync() and fdatasync(). Most
> > pleasurable.
>
> So, if having fake fsync() and fdatasync() is pleasurable for laptop
> and desktop, may be it's time to add option into Kconfig which
> disables normal fsync behaviour in favor of robust desktop?
Nah, just teaching user-space to behave themselves should be sufficient;
there is just no way kicker can justify doing a fdatasync(), I mean,
come on its just showing a friggin menu. I have always wondered why that
thing was so damn slow, like it needs to fetch stuff like that from all
four corners of disk, feh!
Just sliding over a sub-menu can take more than a second; I mean, it
_really_ is just faster to just start things from your favourite shell.
No way is globally disabling fsync() a good thing. I guess Andrew just
is a sucker for punishment :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]