On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 21:02 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Yes. That's because we want to be able to repeat creating the image > without closing the fd in some situations. Oh yeah, I just checked and it's not in fact necessary. I'm just confused. > Still, we could use a global var 'platform_hibernation' or something like this, > I think. Then, we can do > > #define platform_hibernation 0 > > on the architectures that don't need it and make ACPI use it instead of this > "dynamic linking". No, because acpi doesn't know at build time whether it can actually do S4 or not. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- Prev by Date: Re: assembly code in the loadable kernel module
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] RSS container, fix freeing of active pages
- Previous by thread: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- Index(es):
 |