Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> I'm a bit leery of abusing the timespec value like this, though. A
>> flags field seem like it would be cleaner.
>
> It's ugly. Then you have the parameter, which might have nice valid
> values, and they get ignored. I thought about it when this was
> discussed in the working group and thought it's a toss up.
It's pretty ugly either way :-/
>> Something else... if we're dickering with these interfaces, shouldn't we
>> allow setting atime as well?
>
> Why? To allow somebody to hide her/his tracks?
Primarily to let a backup program restore the full state of the filesystem.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
