Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: remove kernel 2.4 code

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>]

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> This patch removes kernel 2.4 code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
>
> ---
>
> This patch has been sent on:
> - 26 Mar 2007
>
>  drivers/scsi/nsp32.c |  109 +++++--------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/drivers/scsi/nsp32.c.old	2007-03-25 20:27:34.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/drivers/scsi/nsp32.c	2007-03-25 20:31:59.000000000 +0200
> @@ -49,10 +49,6 @@
>  #include <scsi/scsi_host.h>
>  #include <scsi/scsi_ioctl.h>
>
> -#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,0))
> -# include <linux/blk.h>
> -#endif
> -

i'm curious about the rules for removing code like this.  in the case
of drivers, isn't it possible that some driver source could be
relevant for both the 2.4 and 2.6 kernel source tree, and simply uses
that kind of preprocessor check to make sure it's being compiled
appropriately?

or are you doing something more sophisticated than simply checking the
kernel version being tested?

rday

-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/