RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior

On Apr 25 2007 10:45, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
>> 
>> BTW, is there any reason this is being cced to lkml?
>
>Since this change affects how tc interacts with the qdisc layer, I cced
>lkml.

Fine with me, at least I get to know that tc could break :)



Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior
    • From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] mm/memory.c: remove warning from an uninitialized spinlock. was: Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2
• Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.21
• Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior
• Next by thread: Reasons to merge suspend2.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]