any idea why there are so many more -stable patches for 2.6.20? this is the 10th
-stable series, and most of them have been dozens of patches.
is there a new team reporting and fixing bugs? or were there just more small
problems found in 2.6.20 then normal? or something else?
David Lang
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.20.10 release.
There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the Cc:
line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email [email protected] to
add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
also email us.
Responses should be made by April 29, 00:00:00 UTC. Anything received
after that time might be too late.
thanks,
the -stable release team
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
