On 4/26/2007, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> In principle, we could add suspend2 as an alternative (in analogy with the I/O
> schedulers, for example), but I think for this purpose it should be reviewed
> properly.
Yeah, this makes sense.
On 4/26/2007, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> There also is a real problem with how it uses the LRU pages. It _seems_ to
> work, but at least to me it seems to be potentially dangerous.
I am new to suspend2 so can you please explain what exactly is dangerous
about it?
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
