On (25/04/07 23:46), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > Yeah. IMO anti-fragmentation and defragmentation is the hack, and we
> > should stay away from higher order allocations whenever possible.
>
> Right and we need to create series of other approaches that we then label
> "non-hack" to replace it.
>
To date, there hasn't been a credible alternative to dealing with
fragmentation. Breaking the 1:1 virtual:physical mapping and defragmenting
would incur a serious performance hit.
> > Hardware is built to handle many small pages efficintly, and I don't
> > understand how it could be an SGI-only issue. Sure, you may have an
> > order of magnitude or more memory than anyone else, but even my lowly
> > desktop _already_ has orders of magnitude more pages than it has TLB
> > entries or cache -- if a workload is cache-nice for me, it probably
> > will be on a 1TB machine as well, and if it is bad for the 1TB machine,
> > it is also bad on mine.
>
> There have been numbers of people that have argued the same point. Just
> because we have developed a way of thinking to defend our traditional 4k
> values does not make them right.
>
> > If this is instead an issue of io path or reclaim efficiency, then it
> > would be really nice to see numbers... but I don't think making these
> > fundamental paths more complex and slower is a nice way to fix it
> > (larger PAGE_SIZE would be, though).
>
> The code paths can stay the same. You can switch CONFIG_LARGE pages off
> if you do not want it and it is as it was.
>
It may not even need that that much effort. The most stressful use of the
high order allocation paths here require the creation of a filesystem and
is a deliberate action by the user.
> If you would have a look the patches: The code is significantly cleanup
> and easier to read.
It is easier to read all right and may be worth doing anyway.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]