Hi. On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 10:38 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Apr 26 2007 16:04, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > >Hi again. > > > >So - trying to get back to the original discussion - what (if anything) > >do you see as the way ahead? > > > >The options I can think of are (starting with things I can do): > > > >1) [...] > >2) [...] > >3) [...] > >4) [...] > >5) [...] > >6) [...] > >7) [...] > > Perhaps do it the EVMS way? Do as much in userspace as possible, and > trying having a simple kernel API at the same time. > Perhaps (3) would be it, but ask Redhat _first_ before quitting anything :) :) Well, the EVMS way is swsusp. Personally, I agree with Linus that think putting suspend to disk code in userspace is just a broken idea. Regards, Nigel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Back to the future.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Back to the future.
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Back to the future.
- Prev by Date: Re: Back to the future.
- Next by Date: [PATCH] change global zonelist order on NUMA v2
- Previous by thread: Re: Back to the future.
- Next by thread: Re: Back to the future.
- Index(es):
 |