Re: pcmcia - failed to initialize IDE interface

On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:48:09AM +0200, Aeschbacher, Fabrice wrote:
> __request_resource: new=ide0[10200e-10200e], root=PCI IO[1000-fffffffff]
> __request_resource: new=ide0[102000-102007], root=PCI IO[1000-fffffffff]
> 
> I added some printk() only for debugging raisons (for example in
> __request_resource, as you can see)

You might want to also dump the resource flags as well.  The two I show
above (from the PCMCIA calls in ide_config) should not mark the resources
busy.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: pcmcia - failed to initialize IDE interface
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • RE: pcmcia - failed to initialize IDE interface
    • From: "Aeschbacher, Fabrice" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.21
• Next by Date: recomended way to check longest period that interupts are disabled ?
• Previous by thread: RE: pcmcia - failed to initialize IDE interface
• Next by thread: RE: pcmcia - failed to initialize IDE interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]