> > with cfs-v5 finally booting on my machine I have run my daily > > numbercrunching jobs on both cfs-v5 and sd-0.46, 2.6.21-v7 on > > top of a stock openSUSE 10.2 (X86_64). > > Thanks for testing. I actually enjoyed it -- the more extensive test I had promised two days ago is almost finished. There is just one test I have yet to (re)run and I will have a slot for it later today so I'll mail out the results comparing 2.6.21-rc7 (mainline) 2.6.21-rc7-sd046 2.6.21-rc7-cfs-v6-rc2 (X @ nice 0) 2.6.21-rc7-cfs-v6-rc2 (X @ nice -10) during the early afternoon (my time). > You have 3 tasks and only 2 cpus. The %cpu is the percentage of the cpu the > task is currently on that it is using; it is not the percentage of > the "overall cpu available on the machine". Since you have 3 tasks and 2 > cpus, the extra task will always be on one or the other cpu taking half of > the cpu but never on both cpus. I had assumed that given the interval of 3 sec the three tasks would be evenly distributed among the 2 CPUs thus resulting in a CPU% of 66 each because that's what they get in the long run anyway. Apparently 3 sec is too short an interval to see this. > What is important is that if all three tasks are fully cpu bound and started > at the same time at the same nice level, that they all receive close to the > same total cpu time overall showing some fairness is working as well. This > should be the case no matter how many cpus you have. They are started via 'make -j3' which implies they start at the same time (i.e. within a few msec). They initially load some data and then perform extensive computations on that data. Best, Michael -- Technosis GmbH, Geschäftsführer: Michael Gerdau, Tobias Dittmar Sitz Hamburg; HRB 89145 Amtsgericht Hamburg Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ Michael Gerdau email: [email protected] GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
Attachment:
pgp0S8MzjBHps.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
- From: Michael Gerdau <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
- Prev by Date: [DOC] Fix wrong identifier name in Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt
- Next by Date: Linux 2.6.20.9
- Previous by thread: Re: [ck] [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
- Next by thread: cpufreq default governor
- Index(es):