On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
I didn't read your whole post, it's way too long, but I would like to see
your patch in mainline as an option to swsusp. What would make this
infeasible?
For one thing, Linus said not but yesterday that he doesn't want multiple
competing suspend algorithms like this in the kernel at once. (If I parsed
his message correctly, he doesn't want any in the kernel, but he's putting
up with it because it seems somewhat needed.)
Would it be a feasible solution to have a very minimal and generic software
suspend in the kernel, and then various userspace implementations could take
care of this? Or is all of the software suspend code in the kernel absolutely
necessary, such that this wouldn't work?
William Heimbigner
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
