Re: [PATCH -mm] slub: update cpu after new_slab()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:

> > Right. local_irq_save does not switch off preemption as I thought.
> 
> Strange comment.  Preemption is not possible while IRQs are disabled,
> but new_slab() rightly reenables them within itself in the __GFP_WAIT
> case, since it's going off to do a page allocation and may need to wait.

Yes I expected local_irq_save to increase the preempt count and then 
local_irq_enable to simply enable interrupts without affecting the preempt 
count. Thus the process should stay on the same processor.

Never thought it would be possible to move to a different processor in mid 
flight.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux