On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 22:55 +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> Fernando Luis =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=E1zquez?= Cao (on Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:13:28 +0900) wrote:
> >+static __inline__ unsigned long safe_apic_wait_icr_idle(void)
> >+{
> >+ unsigned long send_status;
> >+ int timeout;
> >+
> >+ timeout = 0;
> >+ do {
> >+ udelay(100);
> >+ send_status = apic_read(APIC_ICR) & APIC_ICR_BUSY;
> >+ } while (send_status && (timeout++ < 1000));
> >+
> >+ return send_status;
> >+}
> >+
>
> safe_apic_wait_icr_idle() as coded guarantees a minimum 100 usec delay
> before sending the IPI, this extra delay is unnecessary. Change it to
Hi Keith,
Thank you for the feedback!
> do {
> send_status = apic_read(APIC_ICR) & APIC_ICR_BUSY;
> if (send_status)
> break;
> udelay(100);
> } while (timeout++ < 1000);
Oops, that is a good point. I will resend this patch either tonight or
tomorrow morning.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
