On 4/25/07, Cestonaro, Thilo (external) <Thilo.Cestonaro.external@fujitsu-siemens.com> wrote:
And this prevents the lowmemory to be secured by NX?
What do you mean, when you say "lowmemory"? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- From: "Cestonaro, Thilo \(external\)" <Thilo.Cestonaro.external@fujitsu-siemens.com>
- RE: NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- References:
- NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- From: "Cestonaro, Thilo \(external\)" <Thilo.Cestonaro.external@fujitsu-siemens.com>
- Re: NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- From: William Heimbigner <icxcnika@mar.tar.cc>
- Re: NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- From: "Tuncer Ayaz" <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com>
- RE: NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- From: "Cestonaro, Thilo \(external\)" <Thilo.Cestonaro.external@fujitsu-siemens.com>
- Re: NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- From: "Tuncer Ayaz" <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com>
- Re: NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- From: "Tuncer Ayaz" <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com>
- RE: NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- From: "Cestonaro, Thilo \(external\)" <Thilo.Cestonaro.external@fujitsu-siemens.com>
- NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- Prev by Date: Re: [OOPS] 2.6.21-rc6-git5 in cfq_dispatch_insert
- Next by Date: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
- Previous by thread: RE: NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- Next by thread: RE: NonExecutable Bit in 32Bit
- Index(es):
![]() |