Andrew Morton wrote:
>> [ 2.953862] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff803ae98b>] [<ffffffff803ae98b>] scsi_schedule_eh+0xa/0x57
>> [ 3.058672] [<ffffffff803e1e01>] ata_port_schedule_eh+0x4c/0x50
>> [ 3.064725] [<ffffffff803e1ea7>] ata_port_abort+0xa2/0xae
>> [ 3.070248] [<ffffffff803e1ef9>] ata_port_freeze+0x46/0x57
>> [ 3.075853] [<ffffffff803e4c39>] ahci_interrupt+0x300/0x47a
>> [ 3.081552] [<ffffffff8020eb83>] handle_IRQ_event+0x27/0x57
>> [ 3.087253] [<ffffffff8029a021>] handle_edge_irq+0xee/0x133
>> [ 3.092960] [<ffffffff8025f4e1>] do_IRQ+0x6d/0xd5
>> [ 3.097793] [<ffffffff80255071>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
>> [ 3.103059] [<ffffffff8024e88b>] mwait_idle+0x46/0x4b
>> [ 3.108231] [<ffffffff802422f4>] cpu_idle+0x87/0xaa
>> [ 3.113227] [<ffffffff8025c988>] rest_init+0x49/0x4b
>> [ 3.118322] [<ffffffff805dca5d>] start_kernel+0x291/0x29c
>> [ 3.123837] [<ffffffff805dc13a>] _sinittext+0x13a/0x141
>>
>
> So we took an AHCI interrupt when ata_port.scsi_host was still NULL.
>
> It appears that ATA is presently requesting its IRQ before allocating all
> the resources which are needed to handle an interrupt. Does this
> (resource-leaky) patch fix things?
No, that would break host probing. The port is in frozen (controller
initialized and IRQs masked off) state, so it's not allowed to take
interrupt. If interrupt triggers at this point, it's low level driver
bug. Berck, how reliably can you reproduce this problem? Can you post
the result of 'lspci -nn'?
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]