Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpufreq: allow full selection of default governors

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:03:23PM +0000, William Heimbigner wrote:
 > The following patches should allow selection of conservative, powersave, and 
 > ondemand in the kernel configuration.

This has been rejected several times already.
Ondemand and conservative isn't a viable governor for all cpufreq implementations
(ie, ones with high switching latencies).  Also, see the comment in the Kconfig
a few lines above where you are adding this.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpufreq: allow full selection of default governors
  - From: William Heimbigner <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpufreq: allow full selection of default governors
  - From: "Nish Aravamudan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpufreq: allow full selection of default governors
  - From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC] [PATCH] cpufreq: allow full selection of default governors
  - From: William Heimbigner <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Aligning omap.c from Linux-OMAP to mainline kernel
Next by Date: Re: [Intel IOMMU][patch 8/8] Preserve some Virtual Address when devices cannot address entire range.
Previous by thread: [RFC] [PATCH] cpufreq: allow full selection of default governors
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpufreq: allow full selection of default governors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]