Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well, it _is_ mysterious.
>
> Did you try to locate the code which failed? I got lost in macros and
> include files, and gave up very very easily. Stop hiding, Ingo.
>
OK, I've managed to reproduce it. Removing the local_irq_save/restore
from sched_clock() makes it go away, as I'd expect (otherwise it would
really be magic). But given that it never seems to touch the softlockup
during testing, I have no idea what difference it makes...
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- References:
- Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in Sony PI driver
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 16/25] xen: Use the hvc console infrastructure for Xen console
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
- Index(es):
 |