Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > > That said, you may need to use uWh and uAh instead of mAh and mWh, though.
> > > 
> > > Not sure. Is there any existing chip that can report uAh/uWh? That is
> > > great precision.
> > 
> > The way things are going, it should be feasible for small embedded systems
> > quite soon.  Refer to the previous thread.
> 
> I see... is it also applicable to currents and voltages? I.e. should we
> use uA and uV from the start?

AFAICT, mobile phone in standby can eat less than 1000 uW... so uA/uV
would indeed be nice.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux