On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:55:45AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > yes, we were planning to move this to a different percpu section, where
> > all the elements in this new section will be cacheline aligned(both
> > at the start, aswell as end)
>
> I would not call this a per cpu area. It is used by multiple cpus it
> seems.
not decided about the name yet. but the area is allocated per cpu and yes,
the data can be referred by other cpus.
> But for 0.5%? on what benchmark? Is is really worth it?
famous database workload :)
I don't think the new section will be added for this 0.5%. This is a straight
fwd optimization, and anyone can plug into this new section in future.
thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]