On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:45:03 +0100 (BST) Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > > I've not yet looked at the patch under discussion, but this remark
> > > prompts me... a couple of days ago I got very worried by the various
> > > hard-wired GFP_HIGHUSER allocations in mm/migrate.c and mm/mempolicy.c,
> > > and wondered how those would work out if someone has a blockdev mmap'ed.
> >
> > Hmmm.... These not that critical given that 32 bit NUMA systems are a bit
> > rare.
>
> That's true. And everybody but the owners of those systems wish
> fervently that they didn't exist ;)
>
> > And if a page is in the wrong area then it can be bounced before I/O
> > is performed on it.
>
> I think that much is also true, but not where the problem lies.
> Isn't the problem that filesystems using these block devices
> expect their metadata to be accessible without kmap calls?
>
yup. wherever we dereference buffer_head.b_data we're touching
page_address(buffer_head.b_page) without kmapping.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
