Re: [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46

> Here i'm assuming that the vmstats are directly comparable: that your 
> number-crunchers behave the same during the full runtime - is that 
> correct?

Yes, basically it does (disregarding small fluctuations)

I'll see whether I can produce some type of absolute performance
measure as well. Thinking about it I guess this should be fairly
simple to implement.

Best,
Michael
-- 
 Technosis GmbH, Geschäftsführer: Michael Gerdau, Tobias Dittmar
 Sitz Hamburg; HRB 89145 Amtsgericht Hamburg
 Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
 Michael Gerdau       email: [email protected]
 GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver

Attachment: pgp8AX9Am7GS7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
    • From: Michael Gerdau <[email protected]>
  • Re: [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
    • From: Michael Gerdau <[email protected]>
  • Re: [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] powerpc pseries eeh: Convert to kthread API
• Next by Date: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
• Previous by thread: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
• Next by thread: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v5 vs sd-0.46
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]