On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:54:27 +0900
Hisashi Hifumi <[email protected]> wrote:
> In the case that changing the same bit concurrently, lock prefix or other
> spinlock is needed. But, I think that concurrent bit operation on different
> bits
> is just like OR operation , so lock prefix is not needed.
>
> AMD instruction manual says about bts that ,
>
> "Copies a bit, specified by bit index in a register or 8-bit immediate
> value (second operand), from a bit
> string (first operand), also called the bit base, to the carry flag (CF) of
> the rFLAGS register, and then
> sets the bit in the bit string to 1."
>
> BTS instruction is read-modify-write instruction on bit unit. So concurrent
> bit operation on different
> bits may be possible.
>
This is ia64's __set_bit() hehe..
==
static __inline__ void
__set_bit (int nr, volatile void *addr)
{
*((__u32 *) addr + (nr >> 5)) |= (1 << (nr & 31));
}
==
Bye.
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
