Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> writes:
>> The only reason for using threads here is to get the error recovery
>> out of an interrupt context (where errors may be detected), and then,
>> an hour later, decrement a counter (which is how we limit these to
>> 6 per hour). Thread reaping is "trivial", the thread just exits
>> after an hour.
>
> In addition, it should be a thread and not done from within keventd
> because :
>
> - It can take a long time (well, relatively but still too long for a
> work queue)
>
> - The driver callbacks might need to use keventd or do flush_workqueue
> to synchronize with their own workqueues when doing an internal
> recovery.
>
>> Since these are events rare, I've no particular concern about
>> performance or resource consumption. The current code seems
>> to work just fine. :-)
>
> I think moving to kthread's is cleaner (just a wrapper around kernel
> threads that simplify dealing with reaping them out mostly) and I agree
> with Christoph that it would be nice to be able to "fire off" kthreads
> from interrupt context.. in many cases, we abuse work queues for things
> that should really done from kthreads instead (basically anything that
> takes more than a couple hundred microsecs or so).
On that note does anyone have a problem is we manage the irq spawning
safe kthreads the same way that we manage the work queue entries.
i.e. by a structure allocated by the caller?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
