Based on just this script as load I would say renice on X isn't a good thing. Based on one small test, I would say that renice of X in conjunction with heavy disk i/o and a single fast scrolling xterm (think kernel compile) seems to slow the raid6 thread measurably. Results late tomorrow, it will be an early and long day :-(
Attachment:
glitch1.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] another scheduler beater
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] another scheduler beater
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] another scheduler beater
- Prev by Date: Re: Testing framework
- Next by Date: [REPORT] First "glitch1" results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5
- Previous by thread: Re: SATA SB600 works in 2.6.20.4 but not in 2.6.21-rc5 with irqpoll parameter
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] another scheduler beater
- Index(es):