Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> sorry, i was a bit imprecise here. There is a case where CFS can give 
> out a 'loan' to tasks. The scheduler tick has a low resolution, so it 
> is fundamentally inevitable [*] that tasks will run a bit more than 
> they should, and at a heavy context-switching rates these errors can 
> add up significantly. Furthermore, we want to batch up workloads.
> 
> So CFS has a "no loans larger than sched_granularity_ns" policy (which 
> defaults to 5msec), and it captures these sub-granularity 'loans' with 
> nanosec accounting. This too is a very sane economic policy and is 
> anti-infationary :-)

at which point i guess i should rename CFS to 'EFS' (the Economic Fair 
Scheduler)? =B-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux