Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:28:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It would have been better to have patched page_alloc.c independently, then
>> to have used HIGH_ORDER in "lumpy: increase pressure at the end of the inactive
>> list".
>
> Actually that doesn't matter, because I plan on lumping all the lumpy patches
> together into one lump.
>
> I was going to duck patches #2 and #3, such was my outrage. But given that
> it's all lined up to be a single patch, followup cleanup patches will fit in
> OK. Please.
Yes. Its funny how you can get so close to a change that you can no
longer see the obvious warts on it.
I am actually travelling today, so it'll be tommorrow now. But I'll
roll the cleanups and get them to you. I can also offer you a clean
drop in lumpy stack with the HIGH_ORDER change pulled out to the top
once you are happy.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
