Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver

On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 07:50:36PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2007, at 17:39:59, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> >use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver
> 
> I think you really meant: "Use mutex instead of binary semaphore in  
> idt77252 driver", since this is a binary semaphore (not a mutex,  
> which are always binary):

And the binary semaphore terminology i a little confusing. struct
semaphore is a full counting semaphore that is only used as a binary
semaphore if we want to speak in CS terms.  Than everyone else just
caled them semaphore before these patches started to show up :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver
    • From: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver
    • From: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PREEMPT_RT: 2.6.20-rt8 patch tweaked for 2.6.20.7
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]