DervishD <[email protected]> writes:
> The problem is that if a program writes a file onto the filesystem
> without using statfs first to check for free space, the free_clusters
> entry won't have the real value and the driver may report "disk full" (I
> haven't read the code for the vfat driver, sorry, so I'm not sure about
> this) when really there are plenty of clusters to write the new file.
No need to worry about it. If we ignored the ->free_clusters in
FSINFO, the fat drivers counts the current free clusters by scaning
FAT entries if needed.
> Probably it's stupid to update the free clusters count at mount time
> (sorry if so...) but it looks like a good idea to me. And of course, I
> don't mean to update the value _on disk_, but the kernel's idea of free
> clusters (so even FAT filesystems mounted R/O will report correct
> values).
It would add the limitation to following simple usage,
# mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /mnt
# cp -a * /mnt
# umount
if /dev/sda1 was the large and slow device, "mount" will need several
minutes to counts free clusters. I think the user will be hard to
accept the several minutes at "mount".
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
