Re: Permanent Kgdb integration into the kernel - lets get with it.

> Lots of people want kgdb.  One person is famously less keen on it, but
> we'll be able to talk him around, as long as the patches aren't daft.

The big question is if the kgdb developers seriously want mainline.
At least in the past this definitely wasn't the case.

If they're not open to change requests from mainline reviewers we don't
even need to bother to start the whole exercise.

Just putting their stuff onto korg isn't enough.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Permanent Kgdb integration into the kernel - lets get with it. (Dave: How do FreeBSD folks maintain the KGDB stub?)
  - From: Piet Delaney <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Permanent Kgdb integration into the kernel - lets get with it.
  - From: Piet Delaney <[email protected]>
- Re: Permanent Kgdb integration into the kernel - lets get with it.
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] x86: use defined names for all CPU feature flags
Next by Date: Re: Loud "pop" coming from hard drive on reboot
Previous by thread: Re: Permanent Kgdb integration into the kernel - lets get with it.
Next by thread: Re: Permanent Kgdb integration into the kernel - lets get with it. (Dave: How do FreeBSD folks maintain the KGDB stub?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]