Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> 
> Mark the runqueues ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp to avoid false sharing.

False sharing for a per cpu data structure? Are we updating that 
structure from other processors?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Fault Injection issues: stacktrace x86_64 and failslab NUMA
• Next by Date: Re: AppArmor FAQ
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]