On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Probably just terminological disagreement here. I was referring to
>> allocating the higher-order page from the fault path here, not mapping
>> it or a piece of it with a user pte.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:57:25AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Ah. Okay. I have some dysfunctional patches here that implement mmap
> support. Would you be willing to take care of that aspect of things? Then
> I can focus on the other VM pieces. I am going to post them following this
> message. These are an absolute mess. They do not compile etc etc.
Good stuff. Going over this sounds like more fun than trying to
preemptively clean up after whichever scheduler trainwreck ends up
hitting mainline.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
