* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I mean, we already have four of them (PF_NOFREEZE, PF_FROZEN,
> > > PF_FREEZER_SKIP, TIF_FREEZE), and you will need to introduce two
> > > more for the freezer-based CPU hotplug, so if yet another one is
> > > needed, that will make up almost a separate u8 field ...
> >
> > I am perfectly ok with it. But I am not sure if everybody would
> > agree to have another field in the task struct, though in this case
> > it does make sense :-)
>
> OK by me. You might want to consider making that fields's locking
> protocol be set_bit(), clear_bit(), etc rather than task_lock().
is OK to me too, the extra field isnt a problem.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
