Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 02:04:45PM -0400, Preston A. Elder wrote:
> > Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:53:31PM -0400, Preston A. Elder wrote:
> > >
> > > > Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones
> > > > agpgart: DEBUG 0
> > > > agpgart: DEBUG 1
> > > > __pci_register_driver: In function
> > > > __pci_register_driver: driver = agpgart-amdk7, multithread = 0
> > > > __pci_register_driver: Before Spinlock
> > > > __pci_register_driver: Before List Init
> > > > __pci_register_driver: Before Driver Register
> > > > __pci_register_driver: Error = 0
> > > > __pci_register_driver: Returning 0
> > > >
> > > > The DEBUG 0 and 1 are coming from agp_amdk7_init()
> > > > There is a DEBUG 2 at the top of agp_amdk7_probe(), even before
> > > > pci_find_capability, but the function never gets called.
> > >
> > > bus_add_driver() returns 0 on error, but there's a few different
> > > cases it can fail, which isn't helpful.
>
> Actually I misparsed this function, see below..
>
> > > Add some printk's to
> > > the error cases there, and see if that gives any more clues.
> > >
> > Here you go:
>
> This is odd..
>
> > > > __pci_register_driver: Before Driver Register
> > > > __pci_register_driver: Error = 0
> > > > __pci_register_driver: Returning 0
>
> That __pci_register_driver code is (presumably with your printk's added..)
>
> error = driver_register(&drv->driver);
> printk("Error = %d\n", error);
> if (error) {
> printk("Returning %d\n" error);
> return error;
> }
>
> Which doesn't make much sense. If 'error' is 0, we shouldn't be
> taking that second printk & return. What compiler version is this?
>
> btw Greg, wtf does driver_register return a 0 as 'success' if it
> completes the function, and 0 as 'failure' if !bus ?
> That seems doomed to failure.
>
> > Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones
> > agpgart: DEBUG 0
> > agpgart: DEBUG 1
> > __pci_register_driver: In function
> > __pci_register_driver: driver = agpgart-amdk7, multithread = 0
> > __pci_register_driver: Before Spinlock
> > __pci_register_driver: Before List Init
> > __pci_register_driver: Before Driver Register
> > bus_add_driver: In Function
> > bus_add_driver: Before kobject_set_name (agpgart-amdk7)
> > bus_add_driver: error = 0
> > bus_add_driver: Before kobject_register
> > bus_add_driver: error = 0
> > bus_add_driver: Before driver_attach
> > bus_add_driver: error = 0
> > bus_add_driver: Before klist_add_tail
> > bus_add_driver: Before module_add_driver
> > bus_add_driver: Before driver_add_attrs
> > bus_add_driver: error = 0
> > bus_add_driver: Before add_bind_files
> > bus_add_driver: error = 0
> > bus_add_driver: Returning 0
> > __pci_register_driver: Error = 0
> > __pci_register_driver: Returning 0
>
> So we completed bus_add_driver without failing, then popped back
> up to __pci_register_driver and were somehow treated as
> if we failed. *scratches head*
>
> Dave
>
>
Dave,
Here is the code for __pci_register_driver:
int __pci_register_driver(struct pci_driver *drv, struct module *owner)
{
int error;
printk(KERN_INFO "__pci_register_driver: In function\n");
/* initialize common driver fields */
drv->driver.name = drv->name;
drv->driver.bus = &pci_bus_type;
drv->driver.owner = owner;
drv->driver.kobj.ktype = &pci_driver_kobj_type;
printk(KERN_INFO "__pci_register_driver: driver = %s, multithread = %d\n",
drv->name, pci_multithread_probe);
if (pci_multithread_probe)
drv->driver.multithread_probe = pci_multithread_probe;
else
drv->driver.multithread_probe = drv->multithread_probe;
printk(KERN_INFO "__pci_register_driver: Before Spinlock\n");
spin_lock_init(&drv->dynids.lock);
printk(KERN_INFO "__pci_register_driver: Before List Init\n");
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drv->dynids.list);
printk(KERN_INFO "__pci_register_driver: Before Driver Register\n");
/* register with core */
error = driver_register(&drv->driver);
printk(KERN_INFO "__pci_register_driver: Error = %d\n", error);
if (!error)
error = pci_create_newid_file(drv);
printk(KERN_INFO "__pci_register_driver: Returning %d\n", error);
return error;
}
So in the above case, we ARE saying if driver_register returns 0 then
pci_create_newid_file.
Is it different to the code you have? As I said, this IS 2.6.19.
PreZ :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]